People v. Moore

2018 NY Slip Op 999
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 2018
Docket178 KA 15-01859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 999 (People v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Moore, 2018 NY Slip Op 999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Moore (2018 NY Slip Op 00999)
People v Moore
2018 NY Slip Op 00999
Decided on February 9, 2018
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 9, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

178 KA 15-01859

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

CHRISTOPHER L. MOORE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Victoria M. Argento, J.), rendered September 10, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty plea of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]). Contrary to defendant's contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Tantao, 41 AD3d 1274, 1274 [4th Dept 2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 882 [2007]). County Court "was not required to engage in any particular litany' in order to obtain a valid waiver of the right to appeal" (Tantao, 41 AD3d at 1274-1275, quoting People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909, 910 [1990]). The valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses defendant's challenge to the court's suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Garner, 52 AD3d 1265, 1266 [4th Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 736 [2008]).

Entered: February 9, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jimerson v. State of New York
2018 NY Slip Op 1014 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moore-nyappdiv-2018.