People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Moore

81 A.D.3d 1325, 916 N.Y.S.2d 569

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 81 A.D.3d 1325 (People v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Moore, 81 A.D.3d 1325, 916 N.Y.S.2d 569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Allegany County Court (Thomas P. Brown, J.), rendered June 19, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, a class E felony.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c] [former (i)]). We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied the benefit of his plea bargain. “Compliance with a plea bargain is to be tested against an objective reading of the bargain[ ] and not against a defendant’s subjective interpretation thereof” (People v Cataldo, 39 NY2d 578, 580 [1976]). Here, the records of the plea and sentencing proceedings establish that County Court complied with the plea bargain when it imposed sentence. Defendant’s further contentions with respect to his motions to set aside the sentence pursuant to CPL 440.20 are not properly before us on appeal from the judgment of conviction, and defendant has not obtained permission to appeal from the order denying those motions (see People v Thayer, 210 AD2d 977 [1994]; see also People v Jermain, 56 AD3d 1165 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 926 [2009]). Present—Centra, J.P., Fahey, Lindley, Green and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Allegany County Court (Thomas P. Brown, J.), rendered June 19, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, a class E felony.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated as a felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c] [former (i)]). We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied the benefit of his plea bargain. “Compliance with a plea bargain is to be tested against an objective reading of the bargain[ ] and not against a defendant’s subjective interpretation thereof” (People v Cataldo, 39 NY2d 578, 580 [1976]). Here, the records of the plea and sentencing proceedings establish that County Court complied with the plea bargain when it imposed sentence. Defendant’s further contentions with respect to his motions to set aside the sentence pursuant to CPL 440.20 are not properly before us on appeal from the judgment of conviction, and defendant has not obtained permission to appeal from the order denying those motions (see People v Thayer, 210 AD2d 977 [1994]; see also People v Jermain, 56 AD3d 1165 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 926 [2009]). Present—Centra, J.P., Fahey, Lindley, Green and Martoche, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.3d 1325, 916 N.Y.S.2d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moore-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack