People v. Moore

98 A.D.2d 953, 470 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21272
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Moore. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 A.D.2d 1050

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly refused defendant’s request to charge sexual abuse because on this record there was no reasonable view of the evidence that would support a finding that the defendant committed only sexual abuse but not rape (CPL 300.50, subd 1; see People v Shuman, 37 NY2d 302, 304; cf. People v Green, 56 NY2d 427). Once the jurors rejected defendant’s alibi, there was no reason for them to selectively dissect the complainant’s testimony (see People v Scarborough, 49 NY2d 364, 372-373). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J. — rape, first degree.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Moore, 98 A.D.2d 953, 470 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

98 A.D.2d 953 (People v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Shuman
333 N.E.2d 363 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Scarborough
402 N.E.2d 1127 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Green
437 N.E.2d 1146 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)