People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Moore

23 A.D.2d 670, 258 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4731

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 670 (People v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Moore, 23 A.D.2d 670, 258 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 30, 1964 after a jury trial, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, and imposing sentence. Defendant’s conviction was based, in part, upon his alleged confession which, on the trial, the defendant contended had been coerced. The issue as to whether the confession was voluntary or involuntary was submitted to the jury. In the light of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States (Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368), on this court’s own motion this action is remitted to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the procedure prescribed by this court in its decisions of December 21, 1964 (see, e.g., People v. Davis, 22 A D 2d 921), as modified and amplified by the Court of Appeals in its subsequent decision (People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72). In the interim, the pending appeal in this action will be held in abeyance. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur. ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 30, 1964 after a jury trial, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, and imposing sentence. Defendant’s conviction was based, in part, upon his alleged confession which, on the trial, the defendant contended had been coerced. The issue as to whether the confession was voluntary or involuntary was submitted to the jury. In the light of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States (Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368), on this court’s own motion this action is remitted to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the procedure prescribed by this court in its decisions of December 21, 1964 (see, e.g., People v. Davis, 22 A D 2d 921), as modified and amplified by the Court of Appeals in its subsequent decision (People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72). In the interim, the pending appeal in this action will be held in abeyance. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur. ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 670, 258 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moore-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack