People v. Moore
This text of 48 N.W. 693 (People v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent was. convicted of the crime of rape.
The sole allegation of error is that the court erred in permitting a witness to answer certain questions. When the testimony was offered the attorney for the respondent simply said, “ Objected to,” without giving any reason [135]*135whatever for his objection, nor was the ground of his objection' reasonably apparent. The exception cannot therefore be considered. Ward v. Ward, 37 Mich. 254; Morrissey v. People, 11 Id. 327; Stevens v. Hope, 52 Id. 65; Gilbert v. Kennedy, 22 Id. 117; Comstock v. Smith, 26 Id. 306.
The conviction and sentence ar.e affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 N.W. 693, 86 Mich. 134, 1891 Mich. LEXIS 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moore-mich-1891.