People v. Moon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Moon

269 A.D. 725, 54 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3452

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 1945·Published

Opinion

Judgment of conviction affirmed. All concur, except Dowling and McCurn, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the following grounds: (1) The evidence does not warrant a conviction for manslaughter, first degree, there being no evidence of heat of passion as required by subdivision 2 of section 1050 of the Penal Law. (People v. Heineman, 211 N. Y. 475.) (2) The court, under the peculiar facts, erred in not submitting to the jury manslaughter, second degree. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of manslaughter, first degree.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction affirmed. All concur, except Dowling and McCurn, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the following grounds: (1) The evidence does not warrant a conviction for manslaughter, first degree, there being no evidence of heat of passion as required by subdivision 2 of section 1050 of the Penal Law. (People v. Heineman, 211 N. Y. 475.) (2) The court, under the peculiar facts, erred in not submitting to the jury manslaughter, second degree. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of manslaughter, first degree.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Love, JJ.

People v. Moon, 269 A.D. 725, 54 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

269 A.D. 725 (People v. Moon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related