People v. Montgomery
This text of 711 N.W.2d 82 (People v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jerome Edwin MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 22, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that portion of the Court of Appeals judgment that pertains to this defendant for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, and REINSTATE defendant's convictions for kidnapping, conspiracy to kidnap, and first-degree home invasion. We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the remaining issues that were raised by defendant, but not addressed by the court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
711 N.W.2d 82, 474 Mich. 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-montgomery-mich-2006.