People v. Montez

167 A.D.2d 356, 561 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13486
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 5, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 167 A.D.2d 356 (People v. Montez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Montez, 167 A.D.2d 356, 561 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Grajales, J.), rendered November 27, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that the 41-[357]*357month delay between the date of the crime and the date of his arrest deprived him of his due process right to a speedy trial (see, People v Brown, 124 AD2d 667; see also, People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241). The record establishes that the police were hindered in locating the defendant by the lack of cooperation of available witnesses and the defendant’s use of at least four different addresses identified through a Department of Motor Vehicles computer search. In fact, the police repeatedly surveilled two of the residences and their vicinity. There is nothing in the record to infer that the police delayed arresting the defendant for a tactical advantage (see, People v Bryant, 65 AD2d 333), or that a loss of evidence or witnesses precluded the defendant from presenting a viable defense at trial (see, People v Bonsauger, 91 AD2d 1001).

We further find that the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 (3) to set aside the verdict based upon newly discovered evidence was properly denied for reasons stated in the memorandum decision of Justice Grajales, dated April 2, 1985.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pitt v. State
832 A.2d 267 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2003)
People v. Brown
262 A.D.2d 419 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Cox
188 A.D.2d 316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. McQueen
173 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.D.2d 356, 561 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-montez-nyappdiv-1990.