People v. Montero
This text of 221 A.D.2d 570 (People v. Montero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered March 16, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that the Supreme Court erred by not charging the jury with regard to circumstantial evidence (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hall, 181 AD2d 791) and, in any event, his claim is without merit. Thompson, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.D.2d 570, 634 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-montero-nyappdiv-1995.