People v. Montanez

203 A.D.3d 755, 160 N.Y.S.3d 659, 2022 NY Slip Op 01324
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 2, 2022
DocketInd. No. 2507/19
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 203 A.D.3d 755 (People v. Montanez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Montanez, 203 A.D.3d 755, 160 N.Y.S.3d 659, 2022 NY Slip Op 01324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Montanez (2022 NY Slip Op 01324)
People v Montanez
2022 NY Slip Op 01324
Decided on March 2, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 2, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SHERI S. ROMAN
LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.

2020-09088
(Ind. No. 2507/19)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Gordon Montanez, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Jean M. Joyce, and Melissa Wachs of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (John T. Hecht, J.), rendered September 22, 2020, convicting him of criminal possession of a firearm, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257; People v Headley, 197 AD3d 1329, 1330). The defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the mandatory surcharge, DNA databank fee, and crime victim assistance fee should be vacated pursuant to CPL 420.35(2-a) (see People v Wilson, 168 AD3d 889, 890; People v Logan, 125 AD3d 688).

CONNOLLY, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Malary
181 N.Y.S.3d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Martinez
210 A.D.3d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Count C.
2022 NY Slip Op 03971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Diaz
2022 NY Slip Op 03455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.3d 755, 160 N.Y.S.3d 659, 2022 NY Slip Op 01324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-montanez-nyappdiv-2022.