People v. Montanez
This text of 297 A.D.2d 825 (People v. Montanez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We agree with the hearing court that, despite a defective [826]*826pretrial identification procedure, there was an independent basis for the witness’s in-court identification of the defendant. While the witness was only able to observe the defendant for a short time on the night of the shooting, the area where she observed him was illuminated by four street lights. Furthermore, the witness had seen the defendant, who was dating the witness’s friend, on numerous occasions prior to the shooting (see People v Washington, 111 AD2d 418; People v Dixon, 158 AD2d 467). Altman, J.P., Florio, O’Brien and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 A.D.2d 825, 748 N.Y.2d 58, 748 N.Y.S.2d 58, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-montanez-nyappdiv-2002.