People v. Montanez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Montanez

231 A.D.2d 432, 647 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9217

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 17, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D.2d 432 (People v. Montanez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Montanez, 231 A.D.2d 432, 647 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on or about April 26, 1994, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree [433]*433with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on or about April 26, 1994, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree [433]*433with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D.2d 432, 647 N.Y.S.2d 75, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-montanez-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack