People v. Montalvo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Montalvo

28 A.D.3d 793, 812 N.Y.S.2d 885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 A.D.3d 793 (People v. Montalvo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Montalvo, 28 A.D.3d 793, 812 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J.), all rendered May 22, 2002, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Superior Court information No. 97-01267, attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 99-01250, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under indictment No. 00-00014, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J.), all rendered May 22, 2002, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Superior Court information No. 97-01267, attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 99-01250, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under indictment No. 00-00014, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.3d 793, 812 N.Y.S.2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-montalvo-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack