People v. Montalvo

228 A.D.2d 197, 643 N.Y.2d 342, 643 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6360
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[198]*198Defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea was properly denied without a hearing upon this record showing that a favorable plea was entered after a thorough allocution, belying defendant’s unsupported claims that his plea was induced by his attorney’s coercion and ineffectiveness (see, People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536; People v Galarza, 219 AD2d 514). Defendant was given an adequate opportunity to present these claims in written submissions to the court, including that of his new attorney appointed to represent him on the motion, and no further inquiry was necessary (see, People v Galarza, supra). Concur— Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Montalvo, 228 A.D.2d 197, 643 N.Y.2d 342, 643 N.Y.S.2d 342, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 197 (People v. Montalvo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hubert
245 A.D.2d 146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Rodriguez
238 A.D.2d 150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)