People v. Monks

19 P.2d 843, 130 Cal. App. 199, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 936
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Monks. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Cal. App. 440
California Court of Appeal·Decided March 1, 1933·No. Docket No. 244.·Published

Opinion

[1] This is a motion to dismiss an appeal, under the provisions of section 1 of Rule V of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, for the reason that appellant's opening brief was not filed within the time specified in section 15 of Rule II of the same rules.

Respondent's notice of motion was filed on January 27, 1933, noticing the motion for February 14, 1933. Appellant's opening brief was filed on January 30, 1933. On February 7, 1933, counsel for appellant filed an affidavit giving reasons for the delay in filing the brief.

It has been repeatedly held that where the brief has been filed before the making of the motion to dismiss in open court on the day noticed, an appellate court may deny the motion. (Toth v.Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal.App. 55 [297 P. 564].) Appellant should have applied for an order extending the time within which to file her opening brief. However, respondent has suffered no particular injury from the delay and, under the facts presented, we think the motion should be denied.

Motion denied.

Barnard, P.J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Monks, 19 P.2d 843, 130 Cal. App. 199, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 936 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

19 P.2d 843 (People v. Monks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toth v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
297 P. 564 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)