People v. Moni

13 A.D.3d 262, 786 N.Y.S.2d 176, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15436
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 21, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 A.D.3d 262 (People v. Moni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Moni, 13 A.D.3d 262, 786 N.Y.S.2d 176, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.), rendered June 26, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of JVs to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly declined to provide a circumstantial evidence charge with respect to the possession count, since there [263]*263was both direct and circumstantial evidence of defendant’s guilt. This was a constructive possession case in which the evidence did not warrant an additional instruction on circumstantial evidence (see People v Daddona, 81 NY2d 990, 992 [1993]; People v Perez, 259 AD2d 274 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 976 [1999]). There was direct evidence of defendant’s constructive possession of the contraband itself (compare People v Brian, 84 NY2d 887, 889 [1994]), including testimony that the police observed defendant entering and leaving the back room at his place of employment and then engaging in a hand-to-hand transaction with a person who was subsequently apprehended and found in possession of narcotics in identical packaging to those the police found in the back room of the store.

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Marlow and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Forsythe
59 A.D.3d 1121 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Vasquez
56 A.D.2d 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 A.D.3d 262, 786 N.Y.S.2d 176, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moni-nyappdiv-2004.