People v. Monell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Monell

220 A.D.2d 904, 649 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10185

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 220 A.D.2d 904 (People v. Monell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Monell, 220 A.D.2d 904, 649 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10185 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered April 8, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

In satisfaction of an eight-count indictment charging him with various drug-related crimes, defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree. In accordance with the plea agreement, he was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment, the longest of which was 5 to 25 years. On this appeal, defendant’s attorney requests leave to withdraw as counsel on the basis that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on appeal. Having reviewed the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission, we agree. There is no merit to defendant’s assertion that the sentence imposed was unreasonable. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted.

[905]*905Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered April 8, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

In satisfaction of an eight-count indictment charging him with various drug-related crimes, defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree. In accordance with the plea agreement, he was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment, the longest of which was 5 to 25 years. On this appeal, defendant’s attorney requests leave to withdraw as counsel on the basis that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on appeal. Having reviewed the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission, we agree. There is no merit to defendant’s assertion that the sentence imposed was unreasonable. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted.

[905]*905Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 A.D.2d 904, 649 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-monell-nyappdiv-1995.