People v. Monastra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Monastra

30 A.D.2d 770, 292 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3622

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 770 (People v. Monastra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Monastra, 30 A.D.2d 770, 292 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3622 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal held, decision reserved, and defendant remanded to Erie County Court for imposition of sentence. Memorandum: The defendant and his brother pleaded guilty and were presented together to the court for sentencing, each with his own attorney. The minutes show that the court became involved in discussions with the brother’s attorney, and then pronounced sentence only upon the brother. It also appears that the court failed to comply with section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with respect to the defendant at the time. For these reasons the defendant is remanded to the Erie County Court for imposition of a sentence according to law; and the remaining points [771]*771of the appeal are held and decision thereof is reserved pending such imposition of sentence. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, convicting defendant of attempted robbery, third degree.) Present — Bastow, P. J., Goldman, Del Vecchio, Marsh and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal held, decision reserved, and defendant remanded to Erie County Court for imposition of sentence. Memorandum: The defendant and his brother pleaded guilty and were presented together to the court for sentencing, each with his own attorney. The minutes show that the court became involved in discussions with the brother’s attorney, and then pronounced sentence only upon the brother. It also appears that the court failed to comply with section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with respect to the defendant at the time. For these reasons the defendant is remanded to the Erie County Court for imposition of a sentence according to law; and the remaining points [771]*771of the appeal are held and decision thereof is reserved pending such imposition of sentence. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, convicting defendant of attempted robbery, third degree.) Present — Bastow, P. J., Goldman, Del Vecchio, Marsh and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 770, 292 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-monastra-nyappdiv-1968.