People v. Monaco
59 N.E.2d 450, 293 N.Y. 867, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2287
This text of 59 N.E.2d 450 (People v. Monaco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Monaco, 59 N.E.2d 450, 293 N.Y. 867, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2287 (N.Y. 1944).
Opinion
It was error for the trial court to charge, as a matter of law, that Katz was not an accomplice of the defendant. That was a question, on the record here presented, for the jury.
The judgments should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
Lehman, Ch. J., Lohghean, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.
Judgments reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
59 N.E.2d 450, 293 N.Y. 867, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-monaco-ny-1944.