People v. Molina
57 A.D.3d 959, 869 N.Y.2d 796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Molina. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 A.D.3d 1371 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2008·Published
Opinion
[960]*960The defendant was properly adjudicated a level three sex offender, based, inter alia, on clear and convincing evidence of use of a dangerous instrument during the course of his sex offense (see People v Owusu, 93 NY2d 398, 400-404 [1999]; People v Carter, 53 NY2d 113, 117 [1981]; People v Williams, 40 AD3d 402 [2007]; People v Travis, 273 AD2d 544, 547 [2000]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Mastro, J.E, Miller, Garni and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Molina, 57 A.D.3d 959, 869 N.Y.2d 796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 959 (People v. Molina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Owusu
712 N.E.2d 1228 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
People v. Carter
423 N.E.2d 30 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Williams
40 A.D.3d 402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Travis
273 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)