People v. Mohammed

162 A.D.2d 367, 557 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7747
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 26, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 162 A.D.2d 367 (People v. Mohammed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mohammed, 162 A.D.2d 367, 557 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Wallace, III, J.), rendered on January 4, 1988, convicting defendant, following a jury trial, of assault in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2Vs to 7 years, is unanimously affirmed.

Defendant herein, following a jury trial, was acquitted of rape, sexual abuse and weapon charges, but convicted of assault, specifically, breaking the complainant’s arm. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence against him with respect to intent and whether the victim suffered a serious physical injury. In that regard, the complainant’s testimony that defendant struck her with a karate chop in the course of a violent struggle constituted an adequate predicate from which the jury could conclude that defendant intended to cause injury (see, People v Hildenbrandt, 125 AD2d 819, Iv denied 69 NY2d 881; People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467). Moreover, it is evident that the complainant suffered a "protracted impairment of health” (Penal Law § 10.00 [10]) based upon the evidence that she suffered a fractured humerus requiring several weeks of immobilization. Defendant was, further, not entitled to a justification charge. Counsel did not request such an instruction in his 24-page request-to-charge memorandum, and the claim of self-defense was not raised either during the defense opening or summation. Finally, the trial court did not [368]*368abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stetin
2018 NY Slip Op 8716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Jonah B. (Ferida B.)
2018 NY Slip Op 6735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
State v. Dorrance
70 A.3d 451 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2013)
People v. Santana
70 A.D.3d 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Clift v. Commonwealth
105 S.W.3d 467 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 2003)
People v. Graham
297 A.D.2d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Pittman
253 A.D.2d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Elforte
220 A.D.2d 332 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 A.D.2d 367, 557 N.Y.S.2d 35, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mohammed-nyappdiv-1990.