People v. Mohamedolwan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mohamedolwan

285 A.D.2d 562, 727 N.Y.S.2d 901, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7449

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 16, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 285 A.D.2d 562 (People v. Mohamedolwan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mohamedolwan, 285 A.D.2d 562, 727 N.Y.S.2d 901, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered July 12, 1999, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (five counts), and offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (nine counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI