People v. Mohabir
This text of 202 A.D.3d 1108 (People v. Mohabir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Mohabir |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 01180 |
| Decided on February 23, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 23, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.
2021-02926
(Ind. No. 1633/11)
v
Compton Mohabir, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Samuel Barr of counsel), for appellant.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Gianna Gambino on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ushir Pandit-Durant, J.), imposed April 12, 2021, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v Mohabir, 192 AD3d 1047), on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the resentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.
The period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the resentence was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
BARROS, J.P., ROMAN, CHRISTOPHER and DOWLING, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D.3d 1108, 159 N.Y.S.3d 861, 2022 NY Slip Op 01180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mohabir-nyappdiv-2022.