People v. Moffre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Moffre

34 A.D.2d 703, 309 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5027

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 23, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 A.D.2d 703 (People v. Moffre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Moffre, 34 A.D.2d 703, 309 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5027 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered January 10, 1968, which revoked probation and imposed sentence. An appeal may be taken from an amended judgment revoking probation and imposing sentence. (People v. Ronald W. [Anonymous}, 21 N Y 2d 744.) Defendant’s probation was revoked because he had committed a crime while on probation and under such circumstances the failure of the court to specify the conditions of probation in its original judgment is of no consequence. (See People v. Ware, 29 A D 2d 557, affd. on rearg. 31 A D 2d 544; cf. Code of Grim. Pro., § 932.) The appellant’s contentions as to the invalidity of the original judgment are without merit. (People v. Crandall, 278 App. Div. 1039.) Judgment affirmed. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered January 10, 1968, which revoked probation and imposed sentence. An appeal may be taken from an amended judgment revoking probation and imposing sentence. (People v. Ronald W. [Anonymous}, 21 N Y 2d 744.) Defendant’s probation was revoked because he had committed a crime while on probation and under such circumstances the failure of the court to specify the conditions of probation in its original judgment is of no consequence. (See People v. Ware, 29 A D 2d 557, affd. on rearg. 31 A D 2d 544; cf. Code of Grim. Pro., § 932.) The appellant’s contentions as to the invalidity of the original judgment are without merit. (People v. Crandall, 278 App. Div. 1039.) Judgment affirmed. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 703, 309 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moffre-nyappdiv-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack