People v. Mizhirumbay-Guaman

109 A.D.3d 668, 970 N.Y.S.2d 876
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 28, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 109 A.D.3d 668 (People v. Mizhirumbay-Guaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mizhirumbay-Guaman, 109 A.D.3d 668, 970 N.Y.S.2d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered November 15, 2011, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Although the Rockland County pre-printed form waiver of the [669]*669right to appeal signed by the defendant contained erroneous statements with regard to the waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Edmunson, 109 AD3d 621 [2d Dept 2013]), the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was valid (see id.; People v Pelaez, 100 AD3d 803, 804 [2012], lv denied 21 NY3d 945 [2013]). Thus, review of the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive is precluded (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]). Dillon, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Tovar
2019 NY Slip Op 7881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Batista
2018 NY Slip Op 7445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 A.D.3d 668, 970 N.Y.S.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mizhirumbay-guaman-nyappdiv-2013.