People v. Mixon
87 A.D.3d 919, 929 N.Y.2d 737
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mixon. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 A.D.3d 1455 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 22, 2011·Published
Opinion
[920]*920The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We have no authority to revisit defendant’s prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Mixon, 87 A.D.3d 919, 929 N.Y.2d 737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
87 A.D.3d 919 (People v. Mixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)