People v. Mitteager

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mitteager

56 A.D.2d 583, 391 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10632

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 583 (People v. Mitteager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mitteager, 56 A.D.2d 583, 391 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered October 4, 1974, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, possession of burglar’s tools and unlawful possession of radio devices, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reversing the convictions of possession of burglar’s tools and unlawful possession of radio devices, and the sentences imposed thereon, and the said counts are dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Defendant is correct in his contention that there was insufficient proof to establish his possession, either actual or constructive, of the tire iron or of the radio device, especially in the light of the testimony of the People’s witness Jurkowski (see People v Diaz, 54 AD2d 543; People v Pesce, 18 AD2d 1092). Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered October 4, 1974, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, possession of burglar’s tools and unlawful possession of radio devices, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reversing the convictions of possession of burglar’s tools and unlawful possession of radio devices, and the sentences imposed thereon, and the said counts are dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Defendant is correct in his contention that there was insufficient proof to establish his possession, either actual or constructive, of the tire iron or of the radio device, especially in the light of the testimony of the People’s witness Jurkowski (see People v Diaz, 54 AD2d 543; People v Pesce, 18 AD2d 1092). Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 583, 391 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mitteager-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack