People v. Mitchell

124 A.D.3d 450, 997 N.Y.S.2d 902
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 A.D.3d 1173
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 2015·No. 13940 125N/08·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Anthony J. Ferrara, J., at plea; Ellen Coin, J., at dismissal motion and sentencing), rendered August 12, 2011, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing her to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s CPL 210.40 motion to dismiss the information in furtherance of justice. There is no “compelling factor” (CPL 210.40 [1]) that would warrant that “extraordinary remedy” (People v Moye, 302 AD2d 610, 611 [2d Dept 2003]). On the contrary, defendant failed to comply with her plea agreement as a result of her subsequent arrests, drug use relapses, and absences from mandated treatment. Moreover, there was evidence of her involvement in a fraudulent unemployment benefits scheme.

Concur — Tom, J.P, Friedman, Acosta, Saxe and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mitchell, 124 A.D.3d 450, 997 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

124 A.D.3d 450 (People v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Moye
302 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)