People v. Mitchell

227 A.D.2d 504, 643 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5050
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 A.D.2d 507

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kay, J., at sentencing; Moskowitz, J., at plea), rendered November 3, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review, the denial, after a hearing (Moskówitz, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that (1) the defendant consented to accompany the police to the precinct and (2) the defendant’s inculpatory statements at the precinct were voluntarily and knowingly made after Miranda rights were given and waived (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759; People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122, 128-130).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see, People v Haupt, 71 NY2d 929; People v Joseph, 86 NY2d 565, 571; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mitchell, 227 A.D.2d 504, 643 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5050 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

227 A.D.2d 504 (People v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Joseph
658 N.E.2d 996 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Gonzalez
347 N.E.2d 575 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Haupt
524 N.E.2d 129 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)