People v. Mitchell

711 N.W.2d 317, 474 Mich. 1070

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 1024 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2006·No. 129769·Published

Opinion

711 N.W.2d 317 (2006) 474 Mich. 1070

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gordon Sakou MITCHELL, a/k/a Jamar Mitchell, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 129769, COA No. 264014.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

711 N.W.2d 317 (2006) 474 Mich. 1070

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gordon Sakou MITCHELL, a/k/a Jamar Mitchell, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 129769, COA No. 264014.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

February 27, 2006.

People v. Mitchell, 711 N.W.2d 317, 474 Mich. 1070 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

711 N.W.2d 317 (People v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gordon Sakou MITCHELL, a/k/a Jamar Mitchell, Defendant-Appellant.

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Gordon Sakou MITCHELL, a/k/a Jamar Mitchell, Defendant-Appellant.