People v. Miranda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Miranda

160 A.D.2d 373, 554 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3998

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 12, 1990·Published

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered February 24, 1988, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and sentencing her to an indeterminate prison term of from 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The defendant’s application for waiver of the mandatory surcharge due to indigency is premature. (People v Velez, 150 AD2d 514, Iv denied 74 NY2d 748.) In any event, we find defendant’s arguments concerning the constitutionality of the imposition of the surcharge to be meritless. (See, People v Barnes, 62 NY2d 702.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Smith, JJ.

[Republish]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered February 24, 1988, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and sentencing her to an indeterminate prison term of from 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The defendant’s application for waiver of the mandatory surcharge due to indigency is premature. (People v Velez, 150 AD2d 514, Iv denied 74 NY2d 748.) In any event, we find defendant’s arguments concerning the constitutionality of the imposition of the surcharge to be meritless. (See, People v Barnes, 62 NY2d 702.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Smith, JJ.

[Republish]

People v. Miranda, 160 A.D.2d 373, 554 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3998 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

160 A.D.2d 373 (People v. Miranda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related