People v. Miranda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Miranda

103 A.D.2d 811, 477 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19438

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 16, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 103 A.D.2d 811 (People v. Miranda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Miranda, 103 A.D.2d 811, 477 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), rendered June 11, 1981, affirmed. H Reading the charge in its entirety, we find that the jury was properly instructed on the law. In any event, trial counsel failed to object to those portions of the charge which are now claimed to be improper. We have considered the other contention and find it to be without merit. Niehoff, J. P., Boyers, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Slavin, J.), rendered June 11, 1981, affirmed. H Reading the charge in its entirety, we find that the jury was properly instructed on the law. In any event, trial counsel failed to object to those portions of the charge which are now claimed to be improper. We have considered the other contention and find it to be without merit. Niehoff, J. P., Boyers, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 A.D.2d 811, 477 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-miranda-nyappdiv-1984.