People v. Minori

415 N.E.2d 973, 51 N.Y.2d 930, 434 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2767
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 13, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 415 N.E.2d 973 (People v. Minori) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Minori, 415 N.E.2d 973, 51 N.Y.2d 930, 434 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2767 (N.Y. 1980).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The affirmed finding that defendant’s room was not exclusively within his control is supported by sufficient evidence in the record and is therefore beyond our review (cf. People v Alexander, 37 NY2d 202). The contention that the defendant’s brother-in-law had no authority over the defendant’s room was not raised at the hearing and, having not been preserved, may not be considered on this appeal (cf. People v Tutt, 38 NY2d 1011).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Nelson
2017 NY Slip Op 8903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Farrell v. State
612 N.E.2d 124 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Santarelli
148 A.D.2d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Borden
134 A.D.2d 437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Harrison
443 N.E.2d 447 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 N.E.2d 973, 51 N.Y.2d 930, 434 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-minori-ny-1980.