People v. Minori
This text of 415 N.E.2d 973 (People v. Minori) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The affirmed finding that defendant’s room was not exclusively within his control is supported by sufficient evidence in the record and is therefore beyond our review (cf. People v Alexander, 37 NY2d 202). The contention that the defendant’s brother-in-law had no authority over the defendant’s room was not raised at the hearing and, having not been preserved, may not be considered on this appeal (cf. People v Tutt, 38 NY2d 1011).
Order affirmed in a memorandum:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
415 N.E.2d 973, 51 N.Y.2d 930, 434 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-minori-ny-1980.