People v. Minori
415 N.E.2d 973, 51 N.Y.2d 930, 434 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2767
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The affirmed finding that defendant’s room was not exclusively within his control is supported by sufficient evidence in the record and is therefore beyond our review (cf. People v Alexander, 37 NY2d 202). The contention that the defendant’s brother-in-law had no authority over the defendant’s room was not raised at the hearing and, having not been preserved, may not be considered on this appeal (cf. People v Tutt, 38 NY2d 1011).
Order affirmed in a memorandum:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Minori, 415 N.E.2d 973, 51 N.Y.2d 930, 434 N.Y.S.2d 985, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2767 (N.Y. 1980).
415 N.E.2d 973 (People v. Minori) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Nelson
2017 NY Slip Op 8903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Farrell v. State
612 N.E.2d 124 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Santarelli
148 A.D.2d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Borden
134 A.D.2d 437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Harrison
443 N.E.2d 447 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)