People v. Minniefield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Minniefield

57 A.D.2d 908, 394 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12145

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 908 (People v. Minniefield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Minniefield, 57 A.D.2d 908, 394 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12145 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 7, 1976, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Case remitted to Criminal Term to hear and report on whether defendant-appellant, prior to entering her plea of guilty, had been advised by her trial attorney of the possibility of an "agency” defense, and appeal held in abeyance in the interim (see People v Harris, 54 AD2d 946). The record is presently silent on whether defendant’s trial attorney advised her as to the "agency” defense. The facts which will be brought out at the hearing may shed some light on whether defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and intelligently made. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 7, 1976, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Case remitted to Criminal Term to hear and report on whether defendant-appellant, prior to entering her plea of guilty, had been advised by her trial attorney of the possibility of an "agency” defense, and appeal held in abeyance in the interim (see People v Harris, 54 AD2d 946). The record is presently silent on whether defendant’s trial attorney advised her as to the "agency” defense. The facts which will be brought out at the hearing may shed some light on whether defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and intelligently made. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 908, 394 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-minniefield-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack