People v. Minkowitz
This text of 176 A.D. 894 (People v. Minkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county reversed, and new trial ordered, because of the violation of defendant’s constitutional rights in calling his attorney and trial counsel to the witness stand, and, in the presence of the jury, demanding that he produce certain incriminating papers. (People v. Gibson, 218 N. Y. 70.) In People v. Dolan (186 N. Y. 4), relied on by respondent, no such objection was raised or passed upon, either during the trial or in the reviewing courts. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 A.D. 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-minkowitz-nyappdiv-1916.