People v. Minkowitz

176 A.D. 894

Opinion

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county reversed, and new trial ordered, because of the violation of defendant’s constitutional rights in calling his attorney and trial counsel to the witness stand, and, in the presence of the jury, demanding that he produce certain incriminating papers. (People v. Gibson, 218 N. Y. 70.) In People v. Dolan (186 N. Y. 4), relied on by respondent, no such objection was raised or passed upon, either during the trial or in the reviewing courts. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Minkowitz, 176 A.D. 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

176 A.D. 894 (People v. Minkowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Gibson
112 N.E. 730 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
People v. . Dolan
78 N.E. 569 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)