People v. Mingo
37 A.D.3d 854, 830 N.Y.S.2d 524
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mingo. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 A.D.3d 1270 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 27, 2007·Published
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marras, J.), imposed January 15, 2004, on the ground that the amended sentence is excessive.
Ordered that the amended sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, EJ., Ritter, Florio and Covello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Mingo, 37 A.D.3d 854, 830 N.Y.S.2d 524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).
37 A.D.3d 854 (People v. Mingo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.