People v. Ming Wong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ming Wong

237 A.D.2d 308, 655 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2080

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 308 (People v. Ming Wong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ming Wong, 237 A.D.2d 308, 655 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much [309]*309of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated April 19, 1994, as sua sponte vacated the defendants’ convictions for unlawful imprisonment in the first degree.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The crimes committed by the defendants were essentially robbery and burglary. Since the incidental restraint in such cases merged into the ultimate crimes, the trial court properly dismissed the convictions for unlawful imprisonment in the first degree (see generally, People v Geaslen, 54 NY2d 510, 516-517; People v Gonzalez, 80 NY2d 146, 153). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much [309]*309of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated April 19, 1994, as sua sponte vacated the defendants’ convictions for unlawful imprisonment in the first degree.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The crimes committed by the defendants were essentially robbery and burglary. Since the incidental restraint in such cases merged into the ultimate crimes, the trial court properly dismissed the convictions for unlawful imprisonment in the first degree (see generally, People v Geaslen, 54 NY2d 510, 516-517; People v Gonzalez, 80 NY2d 146, 153). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D.2d 308, 655 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ming-wong-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack