People v. Ming Wong

237 A.D.2d 308, 655 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2080
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, from so much [309] of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated April 19, 1994, as sua sponte vacated the defendants’ convictions for unlawful imprisonment in the first degree.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The crimes committed by the defendants were essentially robbery and burglary. Since the incidental restraint in such cases merged into the ultimate crimes, the trial court properly dismissed the convictions for unlawful imprisonment in the first degree (see generally, People v Geaslen, 54 NY2d 510, 516-517; People v Gonzalez, 80 NY2d 146, 153). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ming Wong, 237 A.D.2d 308, 655 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 308 (People v. Ming Wong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Credle
272 A.D.2d 407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)