People v. Miloro

205 N.E.2d 205, 15 N.Y.2d 730, 256 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1656
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 14, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 N.E.2d 205 (People v. Miloro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Miloro, 205 N.E.2d 205, 15 N.Y.2d 730, 256 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1656 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinion

In the first above-entitled action: Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

In the second above-entitled action: Order affirmed. In affirming, we do not hold that the acceptance of a plea of guilty to a specific indictment automatically and necessarily covers crimes predicated on previous conduct for which defendant, has been or may be subsequently indicted. Our determination here is only that, on this record, the trial court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing the indictment. (Code Crim. Pro., § 671.)

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States ex rel. Miloro v. Deegan
284 F. Supp. 660 (S.D. New York, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 N.E.2d 205, 15 N.Y.2d 730, 256 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-miloro-ny-1965.