People v. Millspaugh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Millspaugh

5 A.D.2d 685, 168 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3703

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 685 (People v. Millspaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Millspaugh, 5 A.D.2d 685, 168 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, convicting appellant of grand larceny in the second degree (three counts) and of misappropriation by a pnblie officer (three counts — based on the same facts as the grand larceny counts), and sentencing her to serve not less than two and not more than four years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. Judgment modified on the facts by reducing the sentence to not less than one and not more than two years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. As so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed. In our opinion, the sentence was excessive.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, convicting appellant of grand larceny in the second degree (three counts) and of misappropriation by a pnblie officer (three counts — based on the same facts as the grand larceny counts), and sentencing her to serve not less than two and not more than four years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. Judgment modified on the facts by reducing the sentence to not less than one and not more than two years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. As so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed. In our opinion, the sentence was excessive.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 685, 168 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-millspaugh-nyappdiv-1957.