People v. Mills

2017 NY Slip Op 4701, 151 A.D.3d 1739, 53 N.Y.S.3d 846
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mills. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 A.D.3d 1173
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 2017·No. 770 KA 16-01035·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Vincent M. Dinolfo, J.), *1740 rendered April 4, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.30 [1]). We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence. “[N]o mention was made on the record during the course of the allocution concerning the waiver of defendant’s right to appeal his conviction that he was also waiving his right to appeal the [severity] of his sentence” (People v Pimentel, 108 AD3d 861, 862 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1076 [2013]; see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928 [2012]). Moreover, the written waiver of the right to appeal signed by defendant does not state that defendant was waiving his right to appeal his sentence. We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, NeMoyer and Curran, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mills, 2017 NY Slip Op 4701, 151 A.D.3d 1739, 53 N.Y.S.3d 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 4701 (People v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maracle
973 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
People v. Pimentel
108 A.D.3d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)