People v. Mills

103 A.D.3d 1223, 958 N.Y.S.2d 915

This text of 103 A.D.3d 1223 (People v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mills, 103 A.D.3d 1223, 958 N.Y.S.2d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Sperrazza, J.), rendered September 7, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see gener[1224]*1224ally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255-256; People v Scott, 272 AD2d 783, 784 [2000]; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). In any event, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Lindley, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lococo
699 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Scott
272 A.D.2d 783 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.3d 1223, 958 N.Y.S.2d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mills-nyappdiv-2013.