People v. Mills

28 A.D.3d 1182, 817 N.Y.S.2d 544
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mills. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 A.D.3d 1156

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Shirley Troutman, J), rendered August 16, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of perjury in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of perjury in the first degree (Penal Law § 210.15), defendant contends that he raised the possibility of a Bronston defense (see Bronston v United States, 409 US 352 [1973]) during the plea allocution and that County Court therefore erred in accepting his plea without making further inquiry into that defense (see generally People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). We reject that contention, inasmuch as there is no indication in the plea colloquy that defendant had such a potential defense (see People v Oldham, 24 AD3d 1289 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 779 [2006]; People v Cruz, 270 AD2d 890 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 833 [2000]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mills, 28 A.D.3d 1182, 817 N.Y.S.2d 544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 1182 (People v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bronston v. United States
409 U.S. 352 (Supreme Court, 1973)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Cruz
270 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)