People v. Mills
17 Cal. 276
This text of 17 Cal. 276 (People v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Mills, 17 Cal. 276 (Cal. 1861).
Opinion
Baldwin, J. concurring.
The .'indictment is sufficient. It charges that the defendant, unlawfully and feloniously had carnal knowledge of a female child under ten years of age. The facts constituting the offense are stated with sufficient precision.
There is nothing in the other points made. The presumptions are in favor of the regularity of the proceedings.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Deibel v. Kinnear
17 Ohio Law. Abs. 684 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1934)
State v. Jones
80 P. 1095 (Montana Supreme Court, 1905)
Raudabaugh v. Hart
61 Ohio St. (N.S.) 73 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1899)
People v. Rangod
44 P. 1071 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Murphy v. State
22 N.E. 106 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)
United States v. Cannon
4 Utah 122 (Utah Supreme Court, 1885)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 Cal. 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mills-cal-1861.