People v. Millio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Millio

226 A.D.2d 1071, 642 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5536

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 226 A.D.2d 1071 (People v. Millio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Millio, 226 A.D.2d 1071, 642 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, based upon his theft of money and jewelry during an armed robbery at the home of complainants where they operated a diamond sales business. Because defendant never served a notice of alibi pursuant to CPL 250.20 (1), nor offered any explanation for the failure to disclose the alibi at an earlier time before the last day of trial, County Court did not abuse its discretion in precluding defendant’s alibi witnesses from testifying (see, People v Toro, 198 AD2d 532, 533; see also, People v Martin, 209 AD2d 927, lv denied 85 NY2d 911).

We have reviewed the other issues raised by defendant and conclude that they are lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, based upon his theft of money and jewelry during an armed robbery at the home of complainants where they operated a diamond sales business. Because defendant never served a notice of alibi pursuant to CPL 250.20 (1), nor offered any explanation for the failure to disclose the alibi at an earlier time before the last day of trial, County Court did not abuse its discretion in precluding defendant’s alibi witnesses from testifying (see, People v Toro, 198 AD2d 532, 533; see also, People v Martin, 209 AD2d 927, lv denied 85 NY2d 911).

We have reviewed the other issues raised by defendant and conclude that they are lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 A.D.2d 1071, 642 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-millio-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack