People v. Millici

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Millici

16 A.D.2d 961, 229 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9161

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 961 (People v. Millici) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Millici, 16 A.D.2d 961, 229 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered June 29, 1960, on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted possession of a dangerous weapon as a felony (Penal Law, § 1897, subd. 4), and sentencing him as a third felony offender to serve a term of three and one-half to seven years. The appeal is taken solely upon the ground of exeessiveness of the sentence. Judgment modified on the facts by reducing the sentence to a term of one year and nine months to seven years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. In our opinion, under all the circumstances disclosed, the sentence was excessive. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered June 29, 1960, on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted possession of a dangerous weapon as a felony (Penal Law, § 1897, subd. 4), and sentencing him as a third felony offender to serve a term of three and one-half to seven years. The appeal is taken solely upon the ground of exeessiveness of the sentence. Judgment modified on the facts by reducing the sentence to a term of one year and nine months to seven years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. In our opinion, under all the circumstances disclosed, the sentence was excessive. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 961, 229 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-millici-nyappdiv-1962.