People v. Miller

2019 NY Slip Op 811
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 A.D.3d 1485
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 1, 2019·No. MOTION NO. (55/07) KA 04-02539.·Published

Opinion

People v Miller (2019 NY Slip Op 00811)
People v Miller
2019 NY Slip Op 00811
Decided on February 1, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 1, 2019
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ. (Filed Feb. 1, 2019.)
MOTION NO. (55/07) KA 04-02539.

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

KYLE E. MILLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal, specifically, whether the adjudication under the Sex Offender Registration Act here was barred by res judicata. Upon our review of the motion papers, we conclude that counsel's representation was not constitutionally adequate. The order of February 2, 2007 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFrois , 151 AD2d 1046 [4th Dept 1989]). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before May 31, 2019.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miller, 2019 NY Slip Op 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

2019 NY Slip Op 811 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. LeFrois
151 A.D.2d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)