People v. Miller

113 A.D.3d 573, 979 N.Y.2d 522
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 30, 2014·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Defendant contends that his guilty plea should be vacated because he was not informed of any of his constitutional rights under Boykin v Alabama (395 US 238 [1969]). The only ques[574]*574tion that the judge asked was whether “anybody force[d] [him] to plead guilty.” While it has been held that no “uniform mandatory catechism” is required at a plea (People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, 353 [1967], cert denied 393 US 1067 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359 [2013]), the court’s failure to inform defendant of any of his Boykin rights is an error of constitutional dimension mandating reversal (id. at *5).

We note that defendant fulfilled the conditions of his sentence. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Freedman and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miller, 113 A.D.3d 573, 979 N.Y.2d 522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

113 A.D.3d 573 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sanchez
126 A.D.3d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Serrano
45 Misc. 3d 69 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)