People v. Miller

4 A.D.3d 538, 771 N.Y.S.2d 710

This text of 4 A.D.3d 538 (People v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Miller, 4 A.D.3d 538, 771 N.Y.S.2d 710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered March 20, 2002, convicting him of murder in the first degree and murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly limited defense counsel’s cross-examination of one of the People’s witnesses (see People v Messa, 299 AD2d 495 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 597 [2003]).

The defendant’s contention that the trial court committed reversible error when it annotated the verdict sheet is partially unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the contention is without merit (see CPL 310.20 [2]; People v Anderson, 306 AD2d 536 [2003]; People v Pimentel, 282 AD2d 280, 281 [2001]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P, Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Pimentel
282 A.D.2d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Anderson
306 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 A.D.3d 538, 771 N.Y.S.2d 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-miller-nyappdiv-2004.