People v. Miller

278 A.D.2d 434, 718 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13187
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed October 29, 1999, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived, without limitation, the right to appeal his conviction and sentence {see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Since the defendant was informed of the maximum sentence which would be imposed pursuant to the plea agreement, his general waiver of his right to appeal encompasses his claim that the agreed-upon sentence, which was, in fact, imposed, was excessive (see, People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825; People v Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miller, 278 A.D.2d 434, 718 N.Y.S.2d 627, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13187 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 434 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Arellano
281 A.D.2d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)