People v. Miller

276 A.D.2d 322, 714 N.Y.S.2d 212, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10534
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 A.D.2d 828

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered February 24, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility.

The court’s Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459; People v Mattiace, 77 NY2d 269, 275-276; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miller, 276 A.D.2d 322, 714 N.Y.S.2d 212, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 322 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Pavao
451 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Mattiace
568 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)